These Justicers are appointed by the Divine Court as executioners of punishments handed down by the Judges of the court... Justicers have responsibilities for districts, traveling from town to town to dispense the justice of the court.
Right but none of what is written in LORE is applicable any more since a while back Toran disbanded the Jutsicers over the trial of Navarre and the Justicers went to work for the church of Rofirein. Toranites now have very little to do with law enforcement and are more seeking out evil and fighting it. There is no information at all about how the Rofireinite church has integrated this new law enforcement role into its rules and codes and thus the confusion I think people are having.
While it should be noted that most characters should have at least a healthy respect for Rofies in regards to their role as law enforcement, there are a great many people who have little or no regard for authority figures, ranging to great disregard. A character who gives a Rofierenite cleric lip is not necessarily doing it because he or she knows that they'll be safe from consequences - they may, in-character, have no respect for the church of Rofieren, and express it by.. well.. expressing a lack of respect for it's clerics. Joe Chaotic: "Good evening Officer." Jim Rofie: "I need you for questioning!" Joe Chaotic: "And I need another drink. If wishes were horses, beggars of 15th level or higher would ride." Jim Rofie: "By the authority granted..." etc. etc. etc. Joe Chaotic: "I do not hold your station in respect, nor authority vested therein. If you wish to question me, kindly inform the local officer of the law." This COULD be Joe Chaotic banking on the right to refuse PvP, but it could just as well be Joe Chaotic being Joe CHAOTIC. Who may, incidentally, have decided that in this instance,that it is unlikely Jim Rofie is going to bash his brains out with a mace for being uppity. While Rofierenites may command a certain amount of respect from those that respect the law, not everyone does.
This isn't exactly on topic, but it seems like a good place for it. It isn't aimed at anything already said, but just popped into my head while I was reading. While Chaos and Law are on opposite sides of the ethical line, Chaotic characters aren't necessarily utterly opposed to Law, and vice versa. A Chaotic character might be consciously opposed to authority and choose to stand firmly against it, or might be fine with authority doing its thing and only be opposed to being told what to do. So a Rofireinite who demands this and that based on his authority might not get anywhere, while another Rofireinite who asks this and that without threat could go a long way. Obviously, there are a lot of factors at work here - the type of Chaotic, the nature of the Rofireinite, the Wisdom of either character, the moral alignment of the characters... Back on topic, while Rofireinites can use force, they aren't above the law. If a Rofireinite is asking questions and someone doesn't want to answer, they don't have any right to beat that person up any more than any other random person on the street does. I don't think there is any particular law that says anyone must transfer pertinent information to random questioners when asked. Even if there were, Rofireinites believe in fair punishments fit for the crime, and beating someone seems pretty harsh for not answering a couple of questions. I know you're making the point that we should play as if there were a hundred NPC guards ready to take down our characters for causing trouble and that behaving in blatant opposition to the authorities should really have a good chance of getting a character tossed out of town permanently. I also appreciate the point that people might run their mouths while hiding behind the no PvP rules, which is a pretty cheap. I also know that my point isn't talking about that. I just thought it was important to add a little about what Rofireinites do (or should do, or try to do) since there's quite a bit about clubbing folks up there.