Hopefully they don't. I don't see why we should sit on GM members and see if they are peeking but hopefully they are as blind to that discussion as any other player would be. Peeking into it would be abuse of GM powers. No GM is supposed to used their status and access to better their own personal situation. That's pretty stock and card. Hopefully no one on the team is breaking that trust so blatantly. (I've never seen it happen so I am faithful that the team is trustworthy)~row
I had a huge post wrote up and came to my senses and deleted it. But Row you are awful trusting if you think GM never abuse their GM powers.Edited to add: I am not saying all GM's do! I would not had the addiction I had to Layo if it wasn't from the great GM's that kept it fun!
From my perspective, reading the thread on one's own WLDQ application is a minor "offense" if it can even be called that, since the thread is accessible. It's what that GM does with the information that's more important and where the potential abuse comes into play.
I agree that isn't really an abuse of power. My thing is do you really think the other GM's are going to speak honestly about about another GM's WL application? It is just like they wouldn't be honest if they knew the player was going to be viewing the thread. But I guess that isn't really a big deal. The point of my post kinda got of track. hehe
Second, that's silly. It's a forum, there are threads, people read whatever they have access to, and calling it blatant abuse of GM powers is pushing it. It's there. They're curious. They've been trusted with separation of the roleplayable and not, whether it is justified or not in their particular case. There are far more blatant abuses available that can be and have been committed by a GM.This example by comparison is so not a big deal that more harm is done to team reputation by fervently denying it than by shrugging and say if they look then they look. If they use information found there then they are just as able to use plot and other quest information as well and clearly do not have the ability to separate them. If it is absolutely necessary that they not view a piece of information then do it in an IRC channel or in PMs, heh.