The World of Layonara

The Layonara Community => Just for Fun => Topic started by: SuperMunch on April 20, 2006, 04:33:10 AM

Title: Yet Another Test: Machiavellianism
Post by: SuperMunch on April 20, 2006, 04:33:10 AM
The following test is pretty old (1999) but "measures" your level of Machiavellianism - which the masses would call "your level of evil" as Machiavelli's work has been distorted.

http://www.salon.com/books/it/1999/09/13/machtest/index.html (http://www.salon.com/books/it/1999/09/13/machtest/index.html)

I scored a humbling 85 (You are a high Mach, you endorse Machiavelli's opinions).

I expected a little more, but hey - I don't work for the government.
Title: Re: Yet Another Test: Machiavellianism
Post by: muaddib on April 20, 2006, 04:52:36 AM
78
Title: Re: Yet Another Test: Machiavellianism
Post by: D Blaze on April 20, 2006, 07:31:14 AM
84
Title: Re: Yet Another Test: Machiavellianism
Post by: miltonyorkcastle on April 20, 2006, 09:15:52 AM
hehe, I only hit a 66, and I'm still considered a High Mach.
Title: RE: Yet Another Test: Machiavellianism
Post by: Honora on April 20, 2006, 09:29:14 AM
59.  Low Mach.

Too many paladins...I've played too many....
Title: RE: Yet Another Test: Machiavellianism
Post by: DMOE on April 20, 2006, 10:43:39 AM
71 High Mach
Title: RE: Yet Another Test: Machiavellianism
Post by: jjkolb on April 20, 2006, 12:00:01 PM
56 Low Mach
Title: Re: Yet Another Test: Machiavellianism
Post by: Ne'er on April 20, 2006, 02:03:20 PM
85 High Mach
Title: RE: Yet Another Test: Machiavellianism
Post by: crazedgoblin on April 20, 2006, 02:09:25 PM
Your Machiavelli score is: 69 :P
Title: RE: Yet Another Test: Machiavellianism
Post by: Arcanist on April 20, 2006, 02:10:15 PM
84... muhahahahahahahaha
Title: Re: Yet Another Test: Machiavellianism
Post by: _M_O_B_ on April 20, 2006, 02:50:32 PM
Your Machiavelli score is: 83

heh, watch out for me
Title: RE: Yet Another Test: Machiavellianism
Post by: drgn_hntr_alpha on April 20, 2006, 05:50:47 PM
70
Title: Re: Yet Another Test: Machiavellianism
Post by: darkstorme on April 24, 2006, 01:13:46 AM
70 as well... Though that's hardly a comprehensive test to determine quite how Machiavellian someone is.
Title: Re: Yet Another Test: Machiavellianism
Post by: IceDragonDuvessa on April 24, 2006, 02:59:31 AM
88 High Mach
Title: Re: Yet Another Test: Machiavellianism
Post by: Schmack on April 24, 2006, 04:07:32 PM
68 high mach, i would thought it'd be low... but meh
Title: Re: Yet Another Test: Machiavellianism
Post by: Zelda1 on April 24, 2006, 05:31:46 PM
50
low mach ;)
Title: RE: Yet Another Test: Machiavellianism
Post by: Marswipp on April 24, 2006, 09:10:23 PM
49, I reject!
  *thumbs through some of his Philosophy notes* Ah... here's what I'm looking for: "The reason he wrote what he did was so he could be on the nice-side of the Medici family after they over-threw the Council of Ten, and arrested, imprisoned, tortured, and set him in the countryside."
  *sets a copied section of his notes nearby.*  
 
Niccolo Di Bernardo Dei Machiavelli (1469 – 1527)  born when Lorenzo De Medici assumes power in Florence; after Lorenzo's death, the Council of Ten assumes power; at age 29 Machiavelli works as Secretary to the Court for 14 years; 1512, republic overthrown, Medici family reassumes power; Machiavelli arrestes, imprisoned, tortured, and released to the countryside; begins writing with hopes of finding favor with Medici family; dies 1527
 
During lifetime: many political upheavals; religious corruption; complicated shifts in power; leads to pondering of some kind of enduring political order
 
The Prince: set of prescriptions for successful management of state through procurement of power; power is good and should be sought and enjoyed, same for fame, reputation, and honor; ruthlessness may be exercised to achieve a desired end; a Prince should not worry if he is criticized for being cruel as long as subjects remain united and loyal; “It is far better to be feared than loved if you cannot be both.”; generality of people are simple and are easily deceived; “It is better to seem good than to be good.” = “Machiavellian
Sorry for the breaking of some of the fun.  
Title: RE: Yet Another Test: Machiavellianism
Post by: Doc-Holiday on April 24, 2006, 10:43:11 PM
50

hmmm... intresting
Title: Re: Yet Another Test: Machiavellianism
Post by: Marswipp on April 25, 2006, 04:15:19 PM
Is that 'cause you left all answers at a three, or did you make an even split?
Title: Re: Yet Another Test: Machiavellianism
Post by: Marswipp on April 25, 2006, 04:21:48 PM
Well, I gave more exact answers on my opinions and lowered my score two points.

I found that snswering down the middle generates a score of sixty.
Title: Re: Yet Another Test: Machiavellianism
Post by: Eight-Bit on April 26, 2006, 04:23:24 PM
I am not at all suprised by the 92 I was just given. I mean, I play in a Jazz band for god's sake. That's so Machiavellian. Kind of a cute test, even if it is pretty bogus.
Title: Re: Yet Another Test: Machiavellianism
Post by: Filatus on April 27, 2006, 09:49:44 AM
77
Title: Re: Yet Another Test: Machiavellianism
Post by: stragen on May 04, 2006, 04:53:25 PM
The Machiavelli personality test has a range of 0-100
Your Machiavelli score is: 58
You are a low Mach, you reject Machiavelli's opinions.
Most people fall somewhere in the middle, but there's a significant minority at either extreme.

Maybe I'm closer to Priest then you realise.
Title: RE: Yet Another Test: Machiavellianism
Post by: Ar7 on May 07, 2006, 01:25:20 PM
The Machiavelli personality test has a range of 0-100
Your Machiavelli score is: 96
You are a high Mach, you endorse Machiavelli's opinions.

Most people fall somewhere in the middle, but there's a significant minority at either extreme.

I sure selected the right character to play!
Title: RE: Yet Another Test: Machiavellianism
Post by: dadunmir on May 07, 2006, 04:00:10 PM
The Machiavelli personality test has a range of 0-100
Your Machiavelli score is: 65
You are a high Mach, you endorse Machiavelli's opinions.
Most people fall somewhere in the middle, but there's a significant minority at either extreme.

neat questions.
Title: Re: Yet Another Test: Machiavellianism
Post by: feniox on May 07, 2006, 04:18:14 PM
I got 90.

I didn't exaggeerate my answers either, heh.
Title: Re: Yet Another Test: Machiavellianism
Post by: gilshem ironstone on May 30, 2006, 01:25:10 PM
I got a 56.  Which is apparently low.  I am not sure what it all means though.
Title: Re: Yet Another Test: Machiavellianism
Post by: Stephen_Zuckerman on May 30, 2006, 02:07:39 PM
99.

There must be something wrong with me.
Title: Re: Yet Another Test: Machiavellianism
Post by: Hellblazer on July 28, 2008, 11:09:56 AM
96.. ouch! high mach
Title: Re: Yet Another Test: Machiavellianism
Post by: Drizzlin on July 28, 2008, 01:59:44 PM
I put myself in Daralith's mindset, 99!
Title: Re: Yet Another Test: Machiavellianism
Post by: mumbles on July 28, 2008, 02:11:25 PM
71 high mach
Title: Re: Yet Another Test: Machiavellianism
Post by: Masterjack on July 28, 2008, 03:55:02 PM
41 Low Mach
Title: Re: Yet Another Test: Machiavellianism
Post by: Lareth on July 28, 2008, 07:05:33 PM
71 High Mach.... but the real question is... can we trust the survey to tell us the truth??
Title: Re: Yet Another Test: Machiavellianism
Post by: Muhkuman on July 28, 2008, 07:09:04 PM
69 high match
Title: Re: Yet Another Test: Machiavellianism
Post by: Marswipp on July 28, 2008, 07:16:16 PM
Opinions change over time... I wonder where I'll fall now...
Title: Re: Yet Another Test: Machiavellianism
Post by: Fatherchaos on July 28, 2008, 09:55:17 PM
77 - High Mach.

If I'm high Mach, just how much faster than the speed of sound am I going? :)
Title: Re: Yet Another Test: Machiavellianism
Post by: Marswipp on July 30, 2008, 07:43:55 PM
Quote from: Fatherchaos
If I'm high Mach, just how much faster than the speed of sound am I going? :)

If you put it that way, you're well past escape velocity.
SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2026, SimplePortal