Small sugestion.

[Hellblazer]

I'm pretty sure this has been talked before but it would be less of a headache to lot of people, if the large chest fitted a box. We are talking of 5 more spot in it (50 if you are talking of stackable) but also less chest needed in a house per say if it fits. So in both ways it would lessen the loading time of character and housing placeables if there is less chest needed to fit the needs. Which in my sense would result in less loading time lag too.

So basically my suggestion is to up the large chest to 35 instead of 30 to make it uniform with the bags and boxes a player can carry.

with regards

[Dorganath]

Forgive me, but your request is a little jumbled.

On one hand it seems you're asking for housing crates to be able to hold containers (boxes and bags), and on the other hand  it seems you're asking for large crates to have slightly more capacity. Not sure if you're asking for one or both...heh.

If the former, then I'll say it won't happen, due to technical/database issues.  

It's a little inaccurate to compare bags/boxes with crates as crates can hold 30 items regardless of size, whereas bags and boxes can hold up to 35 items but only if they take up one space.  Any larger items will reduce the amount that can be held by a bag or box, whereas they don't affect the capacity of crates.

[Stephen_Zuckerman]

He meant the latter... Honestly, I'd be happy with a way to dump the contents of a bag, whether they all fit or not, into a chest, and have the overflow returned to my inventory. Now THAT would be handy, especially for us crafters.

[Dorganath]

Might be handier to craft more and store less.

As far as being a lag-saver, it's only going to offset the lag from one event (logins) to another (chest opening) that happens more frequently on average, so at best it's a wash.

[Hellblazer]

Aye sorry i was referring to upping the large chest to 35 for it to be equal in quantity to a box (if you carry small 1 size items, like aloe or stuff like that)