The World of Layonara  Forums

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Drizzlin

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 35
21
General Discussion / Re: Answering the Questions
« on: July 17, 2010, 03:01:35 pm »
Dorg,

If you are not a politician, you missed your calling. I have always said that about you. You are right about everything you said. I was never told I was going to fail because we were on the wrong path. I was told "you are out of time".

If we were on the wrong path, maybe that should have been said.

I will see how things go before I think about returning. Thanks for your input Dorg & Ed.

22
General Discussion / Re: Answering the Questions
« on: July 17, 2010, 02:58:56 pm »
Quote from: EdTheKet
Thanks for that clarification of your intentions. In retrospect I was rather hard/harsh in my reply, so you have my apologies for that.


Regarding your point about the failing and the discussien you had with Mnerva and then Dorg, I do remember that. but it wasn't at the start I don't think. Hence my statement of being failed at the start being "nonsense".

From my end, we're all good.


Ditto brother.

Also I do not actually mean "failed from the start". I felt after that incident occurred with the "failing", the road became so rough, we couldn't travel it anymore. This is where and what I meant by failed from the start. That was the perception of me and others on the quest. Maybe we carried that  on our shoulders and it helped lead to the failure. Time was our enemy.

23
General Discussion / Re: Answering the Questions
« on: July 17, 2010, 06:43:33 am »
Ed,

I have way to much respect for you to pick apart your post in the manner you did mine. I have watched you "battle" many a people on forums and I read quoted after quoted posts with you and others where you have told them in is not fair to cut and paste the parts you want from a post. By knit picking apart individual sentences, you loose the entire meaning of the post.

I am not bitter. If you were sitting beside me listening to me tell you these events, you would not think me bitter. You would think me disappointed and know me to be sad if anything. Never bitter.

I apologize in the post my true feelings are lost in translation.

I am not blaming anyone for how long it took to run my quest, those are just the facts. Minerva had to cancel, the players involved had to cancel, during the 6 weeks i was gone, I went to divorce court in another state where I used to live and my ex-wife actually tried to frame me for a crime. When I showed up in the state, they arrested me without a warrant. I got falsely accused and locked up in jail. My ex-wife actually had the state saying, that due to my military training as a spy (LOL i was a dang code copier) that I was a flight risk and the attorney actually said "he will go what is called dark and vanish". I spent over 200k in legal fees to end up with her crying, admitting she lied because she wanted to ruin my life. I was stuck for six weeks throughout all of this. My grandmother had a stroke a few days before one of the quest. Again, not the teams fault, nor am I blaming them. It is NO one individuals fault the quest took as long as it did to get going once Minerva took over. It is just the road I had to walk to get there, that we all walked.

I apologize if it sounds like I am pointing fingers for blame. You are missing my intentions. I was just trying to explain the over all frustrations involved with the WLCDQ. Which again was the original meaning of the post, "Answering the Questions".


There were many canceled quests. Even Minerva had a virus and had to cancel the night of a quest. There were times in game where Minerva had to take long breaks. All of this I was told I would be given extra time and it would not be held against me. When we failed, I still had 3 hours or so, plus the undetermined time I was going to be given credit for. When I was pmed by you Ed, I respected you too much to even argue. I asked about the extended time that was given to other WL quests and quickly given an excuse why their time is justified and mine would not have been.  I was beyond disappointed that I, as a player am held strictly to a time frame of 1500mins, where the DMs are not. A player must be quick with responses, they must keep the quest going and watch the clock. A DM can take all the time they need to get things together and are not held accountable. In most cases, it seemed like the long delays would be taken into account. It wasn't for me.

Minerva did and AMAZING job with the plot, the npcs and the story. She simply just took way to long on the actual quests to type and respond. I literally would sit there pulling my hair out going, "i'm on a time schedule here"! hehe. The ONLY fault I could ever say about Minerva's quests are that she takes her time and her quests can run long and a bit slow. On a normal quest, that is fine and dandy. On a quest with a scheduled time, that is not good. BTW, I am NOT saying I could do a better job!

With the time she takes, her quests are amazing and full of plot, story, and great RP. You can tell she puts great thought and effort into her quests. Minerva's quests are filled all of the key ingredients for making a quest unforgettable. Unfortunately for me, my quest had a time limit. I honestly felt with the long delays and the time it took to run a single event, I would be given extended time if needed. I was wrong.

Correct me if I am wrong, but time-limits were intended to make sure quests didn't run on forever. Exceptions were made for other WLs to run past their time. I know people told me that those WLs were so close. That those WLs put so much time into it. Those WLs had reasons. I don't understand how my reasons were any different?

My WL quest was shelved and in holding by Rowana because Jenara's took so long to get running. At least that is what I was told. I wanted to pick other DMs, bu I was familiar with Rowana's style of DMing and she was my first pick, not to meantion there are not many DMs to choose who can run a WL. Dorg helped point me towards Minerva and she seemed to share my frustration with how long it was taking to get my quest written and started. She seemed motivated to help me. She even spoke to me about how she might take a break from her day to day duties on layo and that there were going to be changes in the time she had. Before any of that, she was going to make sure that my quest finally got going. Those might not have been her exact words, but it was my understanding of our conversations. This is without going into any details of the conversations between Minerva and I that might have been personal.

The only thing I will quote from you Ed is this,

Quote
Nonsense, you weren't failed at the start. If we wanted to fail you at the start we would never have approved you for an attempt and spared us the time of planning and setting it up. Misunderstandings don't fail people, especially if they are resolved like you say.


I showed up for an event and was told by Minerva that I was failed due to not being active enough in game while the WL was going on. This is a fact. Sure one can argue the meaning of the word failed and then argue that because Dorg helped get the quest "unfailed" that I didn't ever actually fail. Is that what you are saying ED, or are you not aware that this actually happened? After that, I never felt I was given a chance. Could that have just been me? Sure. In the end communication is only as good as it is received.

You are correct ED, we have always been cordial and I don't understand why you feel you have to "challenge the accusations". I have always respected you. You are one of the main backbones of Layonara.

I can not stress how much I DO appreciate the work and effort from Minerva, especially on my WLCDQ. I loved the quest. It is the single most amazing quest I have been part of. It was frustrating, challenging and a blast! People should not get caught up on the only real gripes i have. One,ho slow each event was ran. Two, a quest of such magnitude just faded way.

I again extend an apology, that if by explaining my frustrations about the quest and that by trying to explain why I have been absence, in some way offends the staff, I am sorry.

Minerva,

You are an amazing storyteller and person. I am thankful for the time i spent on this WL and the time I got to know you during the quest. On a personal note, I respect the time you put into layonara for the players. Thank you for the time and energy you put into my WL. Thank you for stepping up and giving it a go. Please don't be offended in anyway. My intentions are not to offend. If I have and the staff is in such an uproar, and you feel I am out of place with this post, I will take my leave once again. Once and for all.

Ed,

Please don't take this personal, because it is not. I know there was a lot of work in the back ground that I am unaware of and probably always will be. Thank you and all who were involved for your time.

24
Ask A Gamemaster / Re: Dark Elves and the Law
« on: April 24, 2010, 12:04:10 am »
Quote from: Nehetsrev

 However, if Layonara isn't meant to have much PvP, one has to wonder why monstrous-race PC's were ever allowed (especially with starting alignment requirements that put them in oposition to most other PC's), and why subsequently the PvP Widget was introduced.
 
 ."


Because when layo was created we were all dragon called and each had a connection, no matter the race to "fight" as one for the most part. We were all following the summon of the dragon, with of course our own interests mixed in here and there. Also, evil was not allowed without a CDQ, 1 year playing time on that pc. You couldn't create evil from the get.

The widget and changes for pvp, came as the changes of the game over time occurred. The ever evolving world of online gaming! Who knows, maybe one day it will be open pvp...

Also these changes do offer an alternative means to allow pvp, but were not meant for an open pvp system. In fact, the widget and changes are the exact opposite of "open" pvp. The intent behind the widget was to offer pvp without a dm to witness or approve!

25
Ask A Gamemaster / Re: Dark Elves and the Law
« on: April 23, 2010, 09:51:10 pm »
Quote from: Nehetsrev
In my opinion, any player of a monstrous race-character should already by default be "okay" with being attacked on sight by other non-monstrous race characters, regardless of whether they've earned some notability as a "good-one" through prior in-game achievement that not every PC or NPC may know about.
 
.


I couldn't agree more, until I flip the coin over and look at the other side...

The other side of that coin is that a non-monstrous race player should be by default "okay" with being attacked on sight by other monstrous race characters...

You can't have one without the other...

This is not an open pvp server, therefore open attacking is what it is!

26
Ask A Gamemaster / Re: Dark Elves and the Law
« on: April 23, 2010, 09:47:10 pm »
Go to a dark elf city and read a law written about what an individual has a right too...then raise your human hand and see them cut it off!

Dark elves are monsters and not of the surface. When the laws of humans, elves, and dwarves, ect.. were written, they were not taking into account illithads, dark elves, dragons, beholders, demons ect...

On that note, the maker of the the first wagon probably also didn't take into account seating for giants!

My opinion on the laws of races and taking into account other races, especially when considering a monstrous race vs a "normal" one.

27
Ask A Gamemaster / Re: Ask the Loremaster: Baraeon Ca'duz
« on: April 11, 2010, 01:52:55 am »
LORE: Baraeon Ca'Duz: Prayers and Holy Days

Lord of Spiders, grant me your blessing. May the venom of your children serve as the tool of vengeance in the web I weave around your enemy. May they suffer slowly and, at their last breath, come to the realization vengeance was yours."
– Magus Daralith Del’Mar

Thank you for this and it means a lot to me. I can't begin to tell you how much I appreciate this Honora and Ed. I am going to dust off my NWN webs and come back after reading this...

Thank you for the work you have put, and continue to put, into a world for us to play in and call our home away from home.

28
General Discussion / Re: Happy Birthday Leanthar
« on: April 11, 2010, 01:43:29 am »
Happy Birthday L. Thanks for all you have done, the world of Layonara which you created and the team you have put together over the years that has made this such a special place. You and your team are appreciated. I hope you have a good year boss.

Geo

29
General Discussion / Re: A call to all you malevolent beings!
« on: March 30, 2010, 05:03:12 am »
*grins*

30
General Discussion / Re: Happy happy birthday....
« on: March 30, 2010, 05:00:26 am »
ROAR!!! Happy Birthday!!!

31
General Discussion / Re: You Will Be Missed
« on: March 20, 2010, 11:58:45 pm »
Life is so precious...my heart goes out to his family.

Geo

32
The Dragon Storm Campaign / Re: // Update!
« on: March 11, 2010, 10:24:56 pm »
Glad to hear Halas, be safe out there and keep us up to date!! Some photos would go along way too!

33
General Discussion / Re: Stepping Down from GM'ing
« on: February 28, 2010, 02:29:00 pm »
Thanks for your time here here Twidge as both a DM and player. You are and have always been one of the best things on layonara. You have brought a lot to the server as both DM & player and we appreciate it.

I also appreciate your service to our country and for keeping it safe on your watch. Thanks shipmate.

Drizzlin

34
Layonara Server / Re: Please Welcome To The Team ...
« on: February 20, 2010, 12:10:16 am »
congrats!

35
Layonara Server / Re: A note on world changing/altering quests
« on: February 08, 2010, 09:22:44 pm »
Awesome stuff and good to know Ed. Thanks.

36
General Discussion / Re: Happy Birthday and Happy New Year!
« on: January 04, 2010, 03:21:25 pm »
Way to get older Tanman!!!

37
Quote from: Dorganath
Actually, I'm not entirely sure the original post in this thread was completely serious.  It seems some are taking it as such but more are snickering behind their hands, and some others are taking offense to it, interpreting it as a sarcastic retort to their own suggestions.

Whatever the case, we have over 2300 custom creatures.  Lowering the HP, AB and AC of every single one of them (or even just those that the higher-level melee-oriented characters care about) would be a monumental task. On this fact alone, it is unlikely to be done.

Ironically, this would actually make things easier for those mages who solo using summons and/or Polymorph/Shapechange.


Not if a little spell immunity was added in too!

38
General Discussion / Re: Congratulations polak76
« on: December 23, 2009, 11:09:38 pm »
ROAR!!! Gratz!!!

39
NWN Ideas, Suggestions, Requests / Re: De-nerf Dev Crit thread
« on: December 21, 2009, 04:31:46 am »
Quote from: s0ulz


32(!) levels of focused character development, effectively denying your character of any absorbtion and hit point pool, getting less essential feats than a full-breed fighter could and therefore losing out most multi-classing opportunities and flexibility is my idea of sacrifice, yes.



The 5 levels of WM far out gain the 5 levels of fighter. The special abilities, especially the increased multiplier is HUGE. The Hit Dice of a weapon master is the same as a fighter and so is the BAB. Weapon Master is hardly a sacrifice, in fact it is one of the few prestige classes in all of D&D that is a direct improvement with little to no multiclass negatives. The path of feats you have to take is about the only argument IMO as to why it is a sacrifice to be a WM. However, the dodge, mobility and expertise are great feats on layo.

40
Quote from: Chazzler
Did you mean: Rothe?


Hehe, um yeah!

Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 35