// yeah... *cough* it might have been nice if the Voice and the contingent of knights had been available for the battle, and not just the after-party. :rolleyes: //
Quote from: Script Wrecked// yeah... *cough* it might have been nice if the Voice and the contingent of knights had been available for the battle, and not just the after-party. :rolleyes: //If you read the posts about the battles and look at the numbers lost you will realise that the Rofireinites suffered heavy losses helping in Sederra.
// Indeed they did. But that wasn't the point I was trying to convey.To (attempt to) put this into a clearer context (and apologies for not doing so before), this is not an OOC criticism of whom should and should not have been on the battlefield. It is more of an IC non character-specific point of view.Alas, the people that hold this view are probably a) not aware why the Voice et al wasn't on that battlefield, and b) not across the motivations (and/or machinations ) of the Voice to take this opportunity to press the flesh with Rael.But in that vacuum, people tend to speculate wildly and come to the darker conclusions, rightly or wrongly! //
// Why would the Voice be on the battlefield in the first place? Two of the Voices dont like Rael, the third Siann O'Mally is a women in her sixties?The entire comment and its context even with your attempted justification dont gel. If its IC say it IC. Perhaps it was how it was presented, it appeared to be an ooc jibe and one I didn't feel was justified. If it was in fact mean't to be IC I don't have any problem with it. I guess once again it shows just how careful one has to be when posting such comments.