Dorganath - 5/16/2006 3:19 PM Pretty much what Talan said is right on the money. I would only add that allowing scrolls to be used for enchanting and infusing would really unbalance things. As it is now, a caster can only have so many of a particular spell readied for crafting. Once those are used up, the character has to rest before attempting more. This serves to slow down the craft and to ultimately limit the products produced by the craft within a particular period of time. Allowing scrolls would pretty much negate those limits and would allow someone to buy their way into a particular craft. That and there's simply no reason why a divine caster, or a non-caster for that matter, should be able to do arcane enchanting/infusing. Using a scroll is one thing; understanding magic well enough to place the properties of that spell into an oblect is something else entirely.
Xandor Loriland - 5/16/2006 11:54 PMAfter talking with a couple of other people I guess the issue that really stands out here is one of consistancy. I think that if scrolls can be used for some applications then they should be a ble to be used for all and if you have to have the spell memorized then it should be that way for all. That way you avoid the finger pointing of arcance vs. divine casters and any appearance of favoritism and such. So I would like to revise my suggestion to be that the system should be made consistent however it can be without losing balance. Thanks.
Xandor Loriland - 5/16/2006 4:54 PM After talking with a couple of other people I guess the issue that really stands out here is one of consistancy. I think that if scrolls can be used for some applications then they should be a ble to be used for all and if you have to have the spell memorized then it should be that way for all. That way you avoid the finger pointing of arcance vs. divine casters and any appearance of favoritism and such. So I would like to revise my suggestion to be that the system should be made consistent however it can be without losing balance. Thanks.