Is taking Luck of Heroes at start considered cheesy?

[Flamey]

I was thinking of taking  Luck of Heroes as a starting feat for a halfling rogue character I'm developing for submission, as it seems like such a good feat (+1 to all saving throws), but is this considered cheesy without giving a really good reason why in the bio? Thanks

[Leanthar]

No, not really--at least I don't think it is... It could be a 'bloodline' thing just as well as luck of heroes... *shrugs*

[miltonyorkcastle]

I don't think so... I mean, there are some that people that are just.. well, luckier than others....  I'm not one of them....

[jrizz]

Yeah like our man Grog talk about luck sheesh

[Talan Va'lash]

I don't think its cheesy.  I think very few people acctually take any of the "only at first level" feats.

heh the only time I've taken them myself is when playing a human character with the extra feat they get an all.

-TV

Edit: This feat will NOT improve your chances of finding an emerald however.

[Vellyn]

nope not cheesy at all ... and you'll be making a lot of saving throws in this blasted world so quite beneficial

[s0ulz]

*raises hand* I took, never regretted it since... helps bolster those weak saves