The World of Layonara  Forums

Pages: [1]

Author Topic: Chemistry  (Read 485 times)

Tobias

Chemistry
« on: September 28, 2005, 02:45:00 pm »
[SIZE=10]   *hopes this hasn't been posted before* :)
[/SIZE][SIZE=13]  Element Name: WOMAN
  Symbol:WO
  Atomic Weight: Don't even go there.
  Physical Properties: Generally round in form. Boils at nothing and may freeze at any time. Melts whenever treated properly. Very bitter if mishandled.
  Chemical Properties: Very Active. Highly Unstable. Possesses strong affinity with gold, silver, platinum, and precious stones. Volatile when left alone. Able to absorb great amounts of exotic food. Turns slightly green when placed next to a shinier specimen.
  Usage: Highly ornamental. An extremely good catalyst for dispersion of wealth. Probably the most powerful income-reducing agent known.
  Caution: Highly explosive in inexperienced hands.
  ---------------------------------------------------
  Element Name: Man
  Symbol: XY
  Atomic Weight: 180+/-50
  Physical Properties: Solid at room temperature, but gets bent out of shape easily. Fairly dense and sometimes flaky. Difficult to find a pure sample. Due to rust, aging samples are unable to conduct electricity as easily as young samples.
  Chemical properties: Attempts to bond with WO any chance it can get. Becomes explosive when mixed with KD (Element: Child) for prolonged period of time. Neutralize by saturating with alcohol.
  Usage: None Known. Possibly good methane source... Good specimens are able to produce large quantities on command.
  Caution: In the absence of WO, this element rapidly decomposes and smells.
[/SIZE]
Logged
 

Leanthar

RE: Chemistry
« Reply #1 on: September 28, 2005, 02:48:00 pm »
LOL :)
Logged
 

jrizz

RE: Chemistry
« Reply #2 on: September 28, 2005, 03:19:00 pm »
too good!
Logged
 

Variable

RE: Chemistry
« Reply #3 on: September 28, 2005, 03:34:00 pm »
LOL! thats great... especially after spending an hour and half in chemistry class... :)
Logged
 

aragwen

RE: Chemistry
« Reply #4 on: September 29, 2005, 01:03:00 am »
LOL.....good one Tobias
Logged
 

Sylance

  • Newbie
  • *
    • Posts: 15
      • View Profile
    RE: Chemistry
    « Reply #5 on: September 29, 2005, 10:08:00 am »
    ...shouldnt the womans symbol be XX....if the mens is XY......
    Logged
     

    Dorganath

    RE: Chemistry
    « Reply #6 on: September 29, 2005, 10:15:00 am »
    Ah, Chemistry....
      Some of the best naps in my life were due to college Chemistry. :)
    Logged
     

    Kapitän Awesome

    • Jr. Member
    • **
      • Posts: 74
        • View Profile
      RE: Chemistry
      « Reply #7 on: September 29, 2005, 02:57:00 pm »
      Bah, I was going to take Chemistry this year, since I've been suffering from lack of sleep lately....
      Logged
       

      Marswipp

      RE: Chemistry
      « Reply #8 on: September 30, 2005, 07:33:00 am »
      Um... Maybe, because the element "Human" with its three sub-elements, are always impure... -- You get the idea... -- er, the whatever it is....
      Logged
      Playing D&D 3.5e, D&D 5e, Pathfinder, and exploring Starfinder through a VTT
       

      Rasterick

      RE: Chemistry
      « Reply #9 on: September 30, 2005, 07:44:00 am »
      When I did chemistry at school, we only had four elements:

      Air
      Fire
      Water
      Earth
      Logged
       

      Harloff

      RE: Chemistry
      « Reply #10 on: September 30, 2005, 07:45:00 am »
      there is no such thing as subelements... *sighs*
      Logged
       

      Marswipp

      RE: Chemistry
      « Reply #11 on: October 02, 2005, 05:44:00 am »
      Should I have said "isotopes" then?
      Logged
      Playing D&D 3.5e, D&D 5e, Pathfinder, and exploring Starfinder through a VTT
       

      Doc-Holiday

      RE: Chemistry
      « Reply #12 on: October 02, 2005, 08:40:00 am »
      I was so good in Chemistry I used to have then entire perodical table memorized, and not just the names mind you.
      Logged
       

      Harloff

      RE: Chemistry
      « Reply #13 on: October 02, 2005, 08:54:00 am »
      Isotopes is better yes. But then again isotopes have different wieght and life times, but the chemical properties are very similar.
      Logged
       

      Dorganath

      RE: Chemistry
      « Reply #14 on: October 02, 2005, 08:58:00 am »
      You forgot to mention that some are more stable than others...but yeah, sounds about right Harloff
      Logged
       

      Harloff

      RE: Chemistry
      « Reply #15 on: October 02, 2005, 08:59:00 am »
      That was what i meant with the life time part...
      Logged
       

      Doc-Holiday

      RE: Chemistry
      « Reply #16 on: October 04, 2005, 01:57:00 pm »
      That reminds me of Berklium and Einsteinium for some strange reason
      Logged
       

      Tedulas

      • Jr. Member
      • **
        • Posts: 211
          • View Profile
        RE: Chemistry
        « Reply #17 on: October 09, 2005, 04:55:00 am »
        Chemistry I found boring too. I took it for GCSEs and got an A, so my chemisty teacher (Who kept commentating on my hair throughout the year I had him, everyday) loves me now, and I don't like him - he's annoying...
        Logged
         

        EventHorizon

        RE: Chemistry
        « Reply #18 on: October 09, 2005, 09:45:00 am »
        :) haha, good one!
        Logged
         
        Pages: [1]
        « previous next »
         
        anything