No really, as many players layo have, almost as many ways there is to interpret the spells. Nothing is 100 percent right or wrong. Some people/player care about the spells some dont and thats what makes it such a good topic IC. A topic that can be discussed for eternity on layo and best IC!
If you think that's bad, try explaining spell resistance vs. conjuration. Now nobody would consider that a summoned creature biting somebody with spell resistance up would be interfered with... the animal is physically there and its bite is not a spell ability to be blocked. However, how then do people with spell resistance get the chance to negate physical fireballs, lightning bolts and acid arrows heading thir way? Sure the fire, electricity and acid is there because of magic, but after the initial instance of summoning, one would think that the fire is now a natural and physical occurance. if anything, the fire should have dissipated at the very point of magical creation and fizzled instead of being shot, but what we get is a big fireball which fizzles on the SR warded folks while it is still burning the unwarded people beside them. Another of my long list of beefs with the d20 system, heheh.
*shakes her head*No no No!The proper way of explaining it is as follows:A Wizard/Sorcerer did it...And then walk off nodding sagely.You have much to learn.
Well this has been a great discussion on these two spells. I apreciate everyone's inputs. This will change the way I RP responding to these and other spells.