The World of Layonara  Forums

Author Topic: Yet Another Test: Machiavellianism  (Read 1033 times)

Eight-Bit

Re: Yet Another Test: Machiavellianism
« Reply #20 on: April 26, 2006, 04:23:24 pm »
I am not at all suprised by the 92 I was just given. I mean, I play in a Jazz band for god's sake. That's so Machiavellian. Kind of a cute test, even if it is pretty bogus.
 

Filatus

Re: Yet Another Test: Machiavellianism
« Reply #21 on: April 27, 2006, 09:49:44 am »
77
 

stragen

Re: Yet Another Test: Machiavellianism
« Reply #22 on: May 04, 2006, 04:53:25 pm »
The Machiavelli personality test has a range of 0-100
Your Machiavelli score is: 58
You are a low Mach, you reject Machiavelli's opinions.
Most people fall somewhere in the middle, but there's a significant minority at either extreme.

Maybe I'm closer to Priest then you realise.
 

Ar7

RE: Yet Another Test: Machiavellianism
« Reply #23 on: May 07, 2006, 01:25:20 pm »
The Machiavelli personality test has a range of 0-100
Your Machiavelli score is: 96
You are a high Mach, you endorse Machiavelli's opinions.

Most people fall somewhere in the middle, but there's a significant minority at either extreme.

I sure selected the right character to play!
 

dadunmir

  • Full Member
  • ***
    • Followers of Mist
  • Posts: 293
    • View Profile
RE: Yet Another Test: Machiavellianism
« Reply #24 on: May 07, 2006, 04:00:10 pm »
The Machiavelli personality test has a range of 0-100
Your Machiavelli score is: 65
You are a high Mach, you endorse Machiavelli's opinions.
Most people fall somewhere in the middle, but there's a significant minority at either extreme.

neat questions.
 

feniox

Re: Yet Another Test: Machiavellianism
« Reply #25 on: May 07, 2006, 04:18:14 pm »
I got 90.

I didn't exaggeerate my answers either, heh.
 

gilshem ironstone

Re: Yet Another Test: Machiavellianism
« Reply #26 on: May 30, 2006, 01:25:10 pm »
I got a 56.  Which is apparently low.  I am not sure what it all means though.
 

Stephen_Zuckerman

Re: Yet Another Test: Machiavellianism
« Reply #27 on: May 30, 2006, 02:07:39 pm »
99.

There must be something wrong with me.
 

Hellblazer

Re: Yet Another Test: Machiavellianism
« Reply #28 on: July 28, 2008, 11:09:56 am »
96.. ouch! high mach

Drizzlin

Re: Yet Another Test: Machiavellianism
« Reply #29 on: July 28, 2008, 01:59:44 pm »
I put myself in Daralith's mindset, 99!
 

mumbles

Re: Yet Another Test: Machiavellianism
« Reply #30 on: July 28, 2008, 02:11:25 pm »
71 high mach
 

Masterjack

Re: Yet Another Test: Machiavellianism
« Reply #31 on: July 28, 2008, 03:55:02 pm »
41 Low Mach
 

Lareth

Re: Yet Another Test: Machiavellianism
« Reply #32 on: July 28, 2008, 07:05:33 pm »
71 High Mach.... but the real question is... can we trust the survey to tell us the truth??
 

Muhkuman

  • Jr. Member
  • **
    • Posts: 165
      • View Profile
    Re: Yet Another Test: Machiavellianism
    « Reply #33 on: July 28, 2008, 07:09:04 pm »
    69 high match
     

    Marswipp

    Re: Yet Another Test: Machiavellianism
    « Reply #34 on: July 28, 2008, 07:16:16 pm »
    Opinions change over time... I wonder where I'll fall now...
    Playing D&D 3.5e, D&D 5e, Pathfinder, and exploring Starfinder through a VTT
     

    Fatherchaos

    Re: Yet Another Test: Machiavellianism
    « Reply #35 on: July 28, 2008, 09:55:17 pm »
    77 - High Mach.

    If I'm high Mach, just how much faster than the speed of sound am I going? :)
     

    Marswipp

    Re: Yet Another Test: Machiavellianism
    « Reply #36 on: July 30, 2008, 07:43:55 pm »
    Quote from: Fatherchaos
    If I'm high Mach, just how much faster than the speed of sound am I going? :)

    If you put it that way, you're well past escape velocity.
    Playing D&D 3.5e, D&D 5e, Pathfinder, and exploring Starfinder through a VTT
     

     

    anything